Speude Bradeos: "Who am I ? Why am I here ?"

Sunday, March 6, 2011

"Who am I ? Why am I here ?"

Poor Admiral Stockdale.

If only James Stockdale, George Will, Pat Buchanan and others including me, knew that we should write articles and analyze without telling anyone who we are, as if we were hiding something.

Hiding.

There's an old saying from bureaucrats, "trust me I'm from the government."

Winning ?

Or Hiding ?

Why is information on Alex Jones so sketchy when we know everything about Rush Limbaugh ? Or Charles Coughlin; John Batchelor; Sean Hannity, or even Glenn Beck ?

Why do we know where they went to school, whether they finished, and what they snorted if anything ? I even know who George Will's friends are because I do.

Where did Jones and company work ? What community college was that again ? Who knew him there ? Why was a non graduate propelled along and financed ? Why get in an FBI agent's face at Waco ? Why not get arrested for it ?

And where has that Texas accent gone compared to ten years ago ? Strange.

Why are we treated to Canadian James Corbett residing in Japan as an "English teacher," or Tony Cartalucci, who despite searching is truly another Mr X residing in Asia, without question or backing ?

What are their credentials to be leading the millions that Alex Jones claims as listeners and readers, which I do believe to be true, to an extent.

Who are these masked men ? It would be nice if they all presented why the rest of us should be listening to them.

This is not to say they are nefarious operators but rather to ask why they wear virtual balaclavas.

Hiding.

Or Winning.

Or Whining.

SPQR

No comments:

O puer, qui omnia nomini debes

This blog is written in the unvarnished truth by an Ottaviano (Octavianus), and not the politically correct nonsense of a Globalist publishing house with a post-WWII agenda of anti-Roman, anti-Italian, and anti-Goyim lies. I graduated Phi Beta Kappa with Honors in History from Trinity College and needed only a second thesis or exam to get the B.A. in Political Science or International Relations. I was oddly told that they were "redundant" even though many now get both. I then refused to become a sock puppet like others are, and was maimed on purpose by a bunch of Globalist government paranoids acting through Merck. Their Germanic and Jewish ancestors rioted against my family in Rome with this purpose, assassinated lawful Emperors and defiled the Mausoleum of Augustus in Rome. Stop believing what you were conditioned to think out of post WWII guilt. Nero didn't burn Rome; the fiddle they now say he played wasn't invented until the 16th century, and Nero was assassinated by their ancestors ending our rule. An unlawful coup took hold in 476 and continues unchallenged. Oh, and I'm a ham radio operator, but most of them are incompetent un-opinionated fake emergency responder mush mouths since they dropped the IQ test.

Nicolo Machiavelli

"Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you."

John Locke

"but where no such appeal is, as in the state of nature, for want of positive laws, and judges with authority to appeal to, the state of war once begun, continues, with a right to the innocent party to destroy the other whenever he can, until the aggressor offers peace, and desires reconciliation on such terms as may repair any wrongs he has already done, and secure the innocent for the future; nay, where an appeal to the law, and constituted judges, lies open, but the remedy is denied by a manifest perverting of justice, and a barefaced wresting of the laws to protect or indemnify the violence or injuries of some men, or party of men, there it is hard to imagine any thing but a state of war: for wherever violence is used, and injury done, though by hands appointed to administer justice, it is still violence and injury, however coloured with the name, pretences, or forms of law, the end whereof being to protect and redress the innocent, by an unbiassed application of it, to all who are under it; wherever that is not bona fide done, war is made upon the sufferers, who having no appeal on earth to right them, they are left to the only remedy in such cases, an appeal to heaven."

The "innovative" electric car

MR. MAXIM," asked New Haven Carriage-Maker William Hooker Atwood in 1896, "do you want this carriage to look like a Western buggy-maker's job or do you want it to be a gentleman's carriage?" Answered Hiram Percy Maxim, builder of the Mark I Electric Phaeton: "Like a gentleman's carriage, Mr. Atwood." For almost half a century, the U.S. automobile was indeed a "gentleman's carriage," built for men and bought on the basis of its mechanical excellence, not its sculptured lines or pleasing colors.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

"Who am I ? Why am I here ?"

No comments:

Post a Comment